CHP Case Study 2 – Leisure Centre

Example Study 2: Leisure Centre

This example considers a small office building in Southern Alberta.  Given the facility energy consumption data (shown right), the cost for grid electricity and natural gas, we computed the size of CHP that maximizes the ROI to be a 500kW solution.

7

The ROI is shown as a function of CHP size in the bottom right chart (red), demonstrating a maximum ROI at 500kW. At 500kW, the CHP does not generate sufficient electricity nor heat to provide for all the facilities electricity needs as shown in the left charts (facility demand in red and CHP production in blue). Further cost reductions (top right chart) can be achieved with CHP’s up to 750kW which would provide almost all the facilities needs.  However, the ROI would drop by 5%.

At 750kW, the CHP would provide for most of the electricity needs and would accommodate the base thermal load.  However, the CHP would need to modulate down from 750kW to as much as 300kW for a total of 29% of the time.  As this would decrease efficiencies and increase maintenance costs, a 750kW solution would be considered to be too large.

8

If the surplus electricity could be exported to the grid, a 750kW CHP could run at peak efficiency and improve the ROI.